Climate change, the Left and the establishment tells us, is an "existential threat," a terminology that is becoming so commonly used it is getting annoying, at least to me. Thus, we saw Joe Biden giving a speech in France to observe the 80th anniversary of D-Day saying: "The only existential threat to humanity, including nuclear weapons, is if we do nothing on climate change." Because of the "existential threat of climate change, which is just growing greater, we're working together to accelerate the global transition to net-zero. It is the existential threat to humanity." But this is just rhetoric, not science, as such claims of "10 years left to save the planet," even if such claims made sense, have been made for well over two decades now, and still the magical 10-year figure keeps being rolled out, and the "planet" is still here!
On the contrary, it is climate change alarmism, and its policies which are an existential threat. As was seen in Europe, where heating is necessary to preserve life, the abandonment of fossil fuels for reliable heating threaten lives, and many people did die of hypothermia during the energy crisis produced by the Ukraine War, let alone the expected even larger losses from the eschewing of fossil fuels that climate change alarmist policies entail. But it is not just heating which is threatened, or transport, but the entire fabric of Western civilisation, for petrochemicals are used to create almost every product we use, from plastics to medicines, and agricultural chemicals. The modern world is inconceivable without fossil fuels, and the climate change alarmist agenda thus must be viewed as a decivilisation process. Yes, it is indeed an "existential threat."
The environmentalist call for "degrowth," the new mantra, is little more than an abandonment of all the benefits of civilisation, and an embracing of apocalyptic doom, that the Left seem to crave for, perhaps as an unconscious punishment for existing in their warped political theology.
"While in France observing the 80th anniversary of D-Day and honoring the thousands of brave soldiers who gave their lives fighting the existential threat that was Nazi Germany, President Joe Biden could not help himself from descending into crass political talking points by comparing the most destructive and deadly war in human history to climate change.
"The only existential threat to humanity, including nuclear weapons, is if we do nothing on climate change," Biden declared. Due to the "existential threat of climate change, which is just growing greater, we're working together to accelerate the global transition to net-zero. It is the existential threat to humanity," Biden reiterated.
In reality, climate change is nowhere near an existential threat. In fact, in many ways, the slight warming that has occurred over the past half century or so has made life better for humanity. For instance, NASA satellite data show a significant rise in global plant growth in recent decades -- what some call global greening. A slightly warmer planet is also beneficial because it produces greater crop yields.
However, one can make a compelling argument that climate alarmism, and the policies that climate alarmists support, actually comprise an existential threat to humanity.
First and foremost, climate alarmists are hellbent on ending the use of affordable and reliable energy in the form of fossil fuels. This alone is a horrendous stance that puts millions of lives at risk.
Like it or not, the advent of fossil fuels, namely oil, coal, and natural gas, has been the biggest boon for humanity in all of history. The harnessing of these resources to supply virtually unlimited energy in cost-effective terms has raised billions of people from abject poverty.
Without ample access to fossil fuels, our modern way of life would literally cease to exist. Not only do fossil fuels provide abundant and affordable energy. As the U.S. Department of Energy notes, "Petrochemicals derived from oil and natural gas make the manufacturing of over 6,000 everyday products and high-tech devices possible."
Second, climate alarmists demand that the world immediately transitions to so-called renewable energy and achieve net-zero carbon dioxide emissions. The problem is that renewable energy from solar panels and wind farms is too expensive, unreliable, and not nearly scalable. If the world were to shun fossil fuels in favor of wind and solar, the amount of energy available to use would plummet. This would result in devastation across many fronts.
Third, climate alarmists constantly call for degrowth, both in terms of the economy and in terms of population. Somehow, the climate alarmists have convinced themselves that the solution to the nonexistent problem of a slightly warming planet is for humanity to cull its population growth. This is extremely short-sighted and fails to consider that many developed countries are currently experiencing a stark population decline. If this is not reversed, and soon, many of these once-thriving nations will experience severe demographic problems.
Likewise, calls for economic degrowth, which has been a cause célèbre among climate alarmists for many years now, would wreak havoc and would instantly result in decreased living standards for billions of people. This is especially true for several developing countries, which are banking on economic growth and increased prosperity to lift billions from poverty.
Fourth and finally, climate alarmists, whether they realize it or not, are akin to modern-day Luddites because they excoriate innovations and technological breakthroughs. In many ways, climate alarmists are the opposite of progressives because they seek to regress humanity back to a time when creature comforts and access to the latest and greatest technologies were limited to a select few rather than accessible to the masses. Even worse, by hindering the development of new technologies that could solve some of the world's most vexing problems simply because it does not align with their worldview, climate alarmists are essentially preventing the betterment of the human experience.
Fortunately, it seems like the climate alarmists are losing ground. Polls show that more and more people are skeptical of the constant fearmongering and are becoming aware of the failed doomsday predictions. This is great news, but it is just the start. Unless and until there is a general consensus that climate alarmism is the problem and that the misguided policies supported by climate alarmists are outright rejected by an overwhelming majority, climate alarmism will remain a grave threat to the future of humanity.'