Researchers at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) in Leiden, Netherlands funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have experimented using a vaccine strategy based upon using flying mosquitos as a delivery mechanism for a malaria vaccine. The vaccine consisted of genetically modified malaria parasites. The test subject people were tracked for only a few weeks which raised concerns about the lack of long-term safety with the project. In particular, the subjects had elevated troponin T levels, a biomarker for heart muscle damage or stress, which was not addressed by the researchers, who wrote that this was not related to the trial, although as detailed below, no evidence for this was given.
However, the most concerning thing about the research is that it is producing a mechanism where a vaccine, however experimental, could be got out to a non-complying population using vectors like mosquitos, who become flying syringes. This would be the final assault upon freedom of consent to medical interventions, a right which was severely damaged under the Covid plandemic.
"A bizarre experiment funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation developed a new vaccine strategy using mosquito bites as a delivery vector in pursuit of developing a "next generation" malaria vaccine.
The experiment was conducted by researchers at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) in Leiden, Netherlands, and published last month in the peer-reviewed New England Journal of Medicine.
Researchers explained how they used the bites of mosquitos to deliver a short-lived malaria vaccine comprised of genetically modified malaria parasites.
"We conducted a double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, side-effect profile, and efficacy of immunization, by means of mosquito bites, with a second-generation genetically attenuated parasite (GA2) — a mei2 single knockout P. falciparum NF54 parasite (sporozoite form) with extended development into the liver stage," the researchers stated.
The Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) parasite causes malaria in humans.
The method was meant to boost immunity through bites from mosquitoes carrying a genetically engineered version of the parasite that causes malaria.
First, researchers bioengineered two different types of malaria parasites for the experiment, GA1 and GA2.
GA1 was "designed to stop developing about 24 hours after infection in humans," but had limited effectiveness, leading to the development of GA2.
GA2 was "designed to stop developing about six days post-infection, during the crucial period where the parasites replicate in human liver cells."
The experiment was carried out in two stages.
In Stage A, study participants "were exposed to the bites of 15 or 50 infected mosquitoes."
In Stage B, "healthy adults who had not had malaria were randomly assigned to be exposed to 50 mosquito bites per immunization of GA2, an early-arresting parasite (GA1), or placebo (bites from uninfected mosquitoes)."
Notably, the researchers only tracked infections for 25 days, which means more infections could have occurred after that short tracking period.
And 20% of participants in Stage B showed elevated troponin T levels, a biomarker for heart muscle damage or stress, raising concerns about potential cardiac injury.
However, the researchers claimed the elevated T levels were "unrelated to the trial intervention" without elaborating on how they came to that conclusion.
COVID pandemic critic Dr. Richard Bartlett criticized the study's short observation window, noting that long-term safety data was needed.
"The study raises significant red flags," Dr. Bartlett said. "Tracking participants for just a few weeks is completely inadequate to assess long-term safety or efficacy. We need at least 6 months to a year to properly monitor for parasite infections and evaluate potential complications. Where is the long-term safety data? Without it, we cannot account for late-onset issues or complications that might arise."
He also claimed the elevated T levels were "highly concerning."
"Troponin is a specific marker for heart cell damage, not the liver," he said. "This points to potential cardiac injury, which was seemingly dismissed without proper investigation. This is a serious safety signal that cannot be ignored."
Bill Gates' philanthropic fingerprints are all over this study.
The same month the study was published, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated $2,287,871 to LUMC to develop "next generation malaria vaccine candidates," according to the organization's website.
During the height of the COVID plandemic, critics of the experimental mRNA injections were censored and vilified for speaking out.
Now it seems that mosquito bites are emerging as the next vaccine delivery vector, possibly to circumvent informed consent in future pandemic operation."
"The mosquito research Gates has been funding since at least 2008 appears to have paid off, turning out flying syringes.
Researchers at the Bill Gates Foundation-backed Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands have joined an international effort to transform mosquitoes into flying syringes. According to a study published late last month in the New England Journal of Medicine, they apparently now have an effective way of using mosquitoes to deliver some protection against malaria in unsuspecting humans — and possibly other payloads in the future as well.
Scientists have long toyed with the idea of transforming mosquitoes into "flying vaccinator[s]."
Shigeto Yoshida, the lead researcher on a 2010 study that modified mosquitoes' saliva such that they would deliver leishmania vaccines to mice when sucking their blood, noted that vaccination by insect was "just like a conventional vaccination but with no pain and no cost."
"What's more, continuous exposure to bites will maintain high levels of protective immunity, through natural boosting, for a lifetime. So the insect shifts from being a pest to being beneficial," added Yoshida.
Despite the Japanese geneticist's optimism, his study acknowledged that "medical safety issues and concerns about informed consent mitigate the use of the 'flying vaccinator' as a method to deliver vaccines."
Robert Sinden, professor emeritus of parasite cell biology at Imperial College London, told Science at the time that in addition to vaccinating people without their informed consent, no regulatory agency would sign off on the initiative.
The issue of informed consent, apparently an ongoing issue for elements of the scientific community, was evidently not enough to hinder the continued development of flying vaccinators. Hiroyuki Matsuoka of Jichi Medical University in Japan, for instance, announced that with the help of a 2008 Gates Foundation grant, he was preparing work on an engineered mosquito that could produce and secrete a malaria vaccine protein into a host's skin.
In 2022, Sean Murphy and his team at the University of Washington demonstrated the workability of that idea, testing mosquito-borne malaria vaccines on humans, establishing what they called a "proof of concept" for the technology.
'The parasite dies before it infects the blood cells and evolves into its deadly phase.'
Concerned about the short-lived and marginally effective nature of the malaria vaccines currently approved by the World Health Organization, Dutch researchers at the LUMC similarly turned to genetically modified parasites and mosquito carriers as a potential alternative.
In an earlier trial, the researchers tested the effectiveness of GA1, a malaria parasite genetically modified to stop developing after roughly 24 hours of infection in humans, but found that it only provided low protective efficacy against malaria. Hoping for a better outcome, the researchers crafted another parasite, GA2, to stop developing around six days following invasion in preclinical humanized mouse models.
The Bill Gates-backed Gavi, also known as the Vaccine Alliance, noted that "because the parasite dies before it infects the blood cells and evolves into its deadly phase, it instead acts as a way of priming the immune system, as a vaccination usually would."
Afforded a test group of 43 adults between the ages of 19 and 35 who previously had no record of malaria infection, the researchers subjected subjects to 50 bites from GA2-infected mosquitoes, 50 bites from GA1-infected mosquitoes, or 50 bites from uninfected mosquitoes (placebo), in three vaccination sessions at 28-day intervals. Three weeks following their third devouring by mosquitoes, the human test subjects underwent malaria infection with five bites from infected mosquitoes.
According to the study, eight of the nine participants in the GA2 group received effective protection against the malaria infection. Only one of eight participants in the GA1 group received protection, and none of the participants in the placebo group received protection.
The Dutch researchers now seek to replicate their results in a larger human trial.
"These findings represent a significant step forward in malaria vaccine development," Julius Hafalla, an immunologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told Nature. "The ongoing global malaria burden makes the development of more effective vaccines a critical priority."
Leiden University Medical Center received a $1,578,317 grant from the Gates Foundation in September 2023 for the purpose of understanding "population and geographic factors affecting response to malaria vaccines in endemic countries." In November, the center received a Gates Foundation grant "to improve health outcomes and prevent premature death in populations around the world suffering from high rates of Malaria infection by developing next generation malaria vaccine candidates."
Bill Gates has demonstrated, both directly and through his foundation, a desire to shape public health, the news landscape, education policy, AI, insect populations, American farmland, the energy sector, foreign policy, and the earth itself.
Gates, who took issue in a January 2021 MSNBC interview with content encouraging "people not to trust the advice on masks or taking the vaccine," has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into malaria vaccine research. He noted on his blog in August, "Malaria is caused by a remarkably adaptable parasite that's constantly changing and developing resistance to our drugs and interventions. Fighting it is like playing a global game of high-stakes whack-a-mole: Just when we think we've got it under control, it pops up somewhere else or in a new form."
Gates noted further that it is important to use existing interventions while "laying the groundwork for a malaria-free future." According to Gates, that future might depend on the use of mRNA vaccines or the genetic modification of mosquito population.
According to the utopian billionaire, "One of our biggest challenges isn't scientific; it's financial and political."