How’s this one: a mother of six is facing gaol time after selling a homemade meal to an undercover investigator: http://www.naturalnews.com/056132_regulations_food_police_California.html. The Californian woman sold a meal without a permit, and in the socialist republic of California (much like Australia), that is an offence with one year’s gaol time. She will go on trial in December. We in Australia also have our own versions of “food crimes,” but we may not be as crazy as California yet.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton may not be prosecuted by Trump, who perhaps for strategic reasons has moved away from appointing a special prosecutor, although maybe he might have changed his mind with the Democrat’s challenge of the election results: http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11/27/trump-threatens-prosecute-hillary-clinton-pursues-election-recount.html. Trump said to The New York Times:
“She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I am not looking to hurt them at all.”
Now that’s a novel criminal law principle!
Ann Coulter, who would have made a far better “first woman” president, tweeted: “Whoa! I thought we elected (Trump) president. Did we make him the FBI & (US Department of Justice)? His job is to pick those guys, not do their jobs.”
Even if Trump has done a deal with the Clintons, which is possible – and remember, The Art of the Deal involves compromise – others will not compromise. Foreign governments may investigate the Clinton Foundation, and have already cut funds: http://nypost.com/2016/11/27/trump-administration-will-pressure-foreign-states-to-probe-clinton-foundation/. Other Republicans will continue to pursue Hillary Clinton. Books will continue to expose their corruption.
Maybe, even if Hillary does not go to gaol, she may have to get a licence to sell home cooked meals to survive!