You can't make up outrageous stories like this; from CBS News:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/meta-whistleblower-testimony-senate-judiciary-subcommittee/

The testimony of Sarah Wynn-Williams, a former Meta executive, before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism is nothing short of a bombshell, exposing Mark Zuckerberg's duplicity in a way that demands outrage. For years, Zuckerberg has paraded himself as a champion of free expression, wrapping himself in the American flag while secretly cozying up to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for profit. The allegations laid bare by Wynn-Williams paint a damning picture of a man who sold out American values for a slice of China's $18 billion market.

Wynn-Williams, who served as Meta's director of Global Public Policy from 2011 to 2017, didn't mince words. She accused Meta of building "custom-built censorship tools" for the CCP, tools designed to silence dissent and prop up an authoritarian regime. The idea that Zuckerberg's company—behind platforms like Facebook and Instagram, which billions use to share their lives—was crafting mechanisms to help China suppress voices is infuriating. Worse, she revealed a "virality counter" that flagged posts with over 10,000 views for review by a so-called "chief editor"—a system not just used in mainland China but extended to Hong Kong and Taiwan. This isn't just censorship; it's a betrayal of the very principles of open communication Meta claims to uphold.

The audacity doesn't stop there. Wynn-Williams testified that Chinese officials could "potentially access" American users' data, and when engineers raised alarms about this glaring security risk, Zuckerberg and his leadership shrugged it off. This is the same Zuckerberg who's dodged accountability in congressional hearings, offering vague promises about privacy while apparently greenlighting data vulnerabilities that could expose millions of Americans to CCP surveillance. It's a gut punch to anyone who trusted Meta with their personal information.

Then there's the AI angle. Wynn-Williams alleged that Meta's Llama model fuelled DeepSeek, a Chinese AI firm that's now nipping at the heels of American tech giants like OpenAI. Zuckerberg's willingness to hand over cutting-edge tech to a rival nation, one actively challenging U.S. dominance, is not just reckless; it's a middle finger to national security. And for what? Profit. The fact that Meta earned billions in China while Zuckerberg learned Mandarin in weekly sessions, as Wynn-Williams noted, shows how personally invested he was in this Faustian bargain.

The kicker is Meta's response, calling her testimony "divorced from reality" while admitting they explored China deals "over a decade ago." That's not a denial; it's a dodge. Zuckerberg's been caught red-handed, and instead of owning up, he hides behind PR spin. This is the guy who wants us to believe he's a patriot, yet he's been playing both sides, undermining the very country that gave him his empire.

Sen. Josh Hawley hit the nail on the head, accusing Zuckerberg of making "censorship his business model." His call for Zuckerberg to testify is a bare minimum—Zuckerberg needs to face the music, not just for Meta's actions but for his personal role in prioritising greed over integrity. Wynn-Williams' memoir, Careless People, which Meta tried to suppress, only adds fuel to the fire, exposing a culture of power and greed that's rotten to the core.

What's maddening is the scale of the betrayal. Meta's platforms shape how we connect, think, and live. To know they've been weaponised to serve a regime that stifles freedom, while Zuckerberg plays the all-American CEO, is an outrage that should shake us to our core. He's not just undermining national security; he's eroding trust in the digital world he helped build. Enough with the evasions. Zuckerberg owes answers, and he owes them now!

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/meta-whistleblower-testimony-senate-judiciary-subcommittee/