The notion that vaccines can sometimes trigger the very diseases they aim to prevent, known as "disease provocation," is a long-standing, but often overlooked phenomenon in medical history. Despite over a century of evidence documenting this effect across diseases like typhoid, tuberculosis, polio, and more recently, influenza and COVID-19, the medical establishment frequently dismisses it to protect the narrative of vaccines as universally "safe and effective." A Midwestern Doctor's recent article highlights this forgotten science, revealing how vaccine-induced immune suppression can exacerbate latent or incubating infections, leading to severe illness or even death. This essay supports that analysis, exploring the historical and scientific evidence for disease provocation, its mechanisms, and the urgent need for Australia and other nations to acknowledge and address this risk to safeguard public health and preserve trust in medical systems.

The Historical Record: Disease Provocation Across Decades

The concept of disease provocation is not new. As early as 1893, researchers like Brieger and Ehrlich observed that injecting bacterial proteins into immunised animals caused a temporary drop in immunity, termed the "negative phase," followed by a rise in antibodies. This pattern, where vaccination temporarily weakens the immune response, has been documented repeatedly. Sir Graham Wilson's 1967 exposé, The Hazards of Immunisation, compiled extensive evidence of vaccine-related harms, including disease provocation, drawing on private government records and forgotten literature. Wilson, a respected bacteriologist, argued for honest discussion of vaccine risks, yet his warnings were largely ignored to avoid fuelling "anti-vax" sentiment.

Historical examples are striking:

Typhoid Fever: Studies from 1901 to 1959 showed that typhoid vaccines could activate latent infections or worsen outbreaks. A 1915 report noted severe typhoid cases in German soldiers after vaccination, while a 1920 British campaign saw a surge in cases post-vaccination. A 1950 study found that vaccinating during a typhoid epidemic shortened the incubation period and increased mortality, with 19% of cases vaccinated within 48 hours proving fatal.

Tuberculosis: Robert Koch's 1890 tuberculin therapy, hailed as a cure, instead accelerated tuberculosis infections, leading to deaths and his reputational ruin. Later, BCG vaccination studies in 1951 documented severe reactions, including hemoptysis and lung lesion growth, in patients with latent tuberculosis.

Polio: From the 1930s to 1950s, polio outbreaks often followed diphtheria, pertussis, or tetanus vaccinations, with paralysis frequently affecting the injected limb. A 1950 study found a fourfold increase in polio risk among recently vaccinated children, with paralysis linked to the injection site. The Lancet in 2014 noted that epidemiological data tied polio incidence to immunisation programs, a phenomenon erased from medical memory by the late 1950s.

Miscellaneous Cases: Vaccines for typhoid, diphtheria, and others were linked to reactivations of malaria, trench fever, and even rheumatism, showing that immune diversion could exacerbate a range of latent infections.

These cases reveal a pattern: vaccines can disrupt the immune system's balance, allowing dormant or incubating pathogens to flare, often with severe consequences.

Modern Parallels: Influenza, COVID-19, and Beyond

The same mechanisms persist today. The phenomenon of Original Antigenic Sin (OAS), where vaccination against one strain impairs immunity to others, explains why flu vaccines often increase susceptibility to non-matching strains. Studies from 2009 to 2023, including a 2012 analysis showing a 267% higher hospitalisation risk for vaccinated children, confirm OAS's role in negative vaccine efficacy. Similarly, Cleveland Clinic data from 2023 showed that influenza vaccination increased flu hospitalisation risk, while a 2023 study of 53,402 employees linked COVID-19 boosters to higher infection rates, with each additional dose correlating with greater susceptibility.

COVID-19 vaccines have shown similar effects. Reports from adverse event databases, like VAERS, indicate that COVID-19 itself is a leading cause of death post-vaccination, often weeks after the shot. This aligns with anecdotal accounts of asymptomatic infections turning severe post-vaccination, as seen in a case from Steve Kirsch's survey where a PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection worsened immediately after a shot. The HPV vaccine offers another example: women vaccinated for a pre-existing HPV strain face a higher risk of cervical cancer, likely due to immune diversion exacerbating chronic inflammation.

Other conditions, like shingles and Lyme disease, also flare post-vaccination. MyLymeData reported that 25–28% of Lyme patients experienced flares after COVID-19 vaccination, while Pfizer's trial data, released under court order, documented multiple shingles cases. These reactivations suggest that vaccines can suppress the immune system's ability to control latent infections, a risk ignored by current guidelines that don't require pre-vaccination testing for conditions like HPV or COVID-19.

Mechanisms: Immune Suppression and Off-Target Effects

The primary mechanism behind disease provocation appears to be vaccine-induced immune suppression. Vaccines hyper-prime the immune system to target a specific antigen, diverting resources from other threats. This "off-target immunity" can weaken responses to latent or incubating infections, allowing them to spiral out of control. OAS, for instance, shows how flu vaccination can impair immunity to non-matching strains, increasing viral load and transmission. Similarly, aluminium adjuvants, used to boost immune responses, persist in the body, potentially causing chronic immune dysregulation, including blood sludging and autoimmunity.

Historical studies, like Raettig's 1959 experiments with typhoid-infected mice, demonstrated that vaccination during an infection's incubation period could accelerate death, particularly with matching vaccines. This suggests that vaccines can shorten incubation periods or amplify pathogen activity. Modern data, such as the Cleveland Clinic's findings, support this, showing a dose-dependent increase in COVID-19 susceptibility post-vaccination, possibly due to mRNA persistence or hematopoietic stem cell damage.

Autoimmune and allergic reactions further complicate the picture. Vaccines, by overstimulating the immune system, can trigger responses to non-target antigens, like pollens or self-tissues, contributing to the global rise in chronic illnesses. Paul Offit's claim that the immune system can handle 10,000 antigens, ignores the complexity of immune prioritisation, as finite immune resources struggle to balance artificial and natural threats.

Australia's Context: A Call for Vigilance

Australia's recent push for digital censorship, exemplified by the 2025 social media ban for under-16s and activist-driven game bans, reflects a broader trend of state overreach. This "anarcho-tyranny," neglecting core governance while policing expression, parallels the medical establishment's dismissal of vaccine risks to maintain public compliance. The eSafety Commissioner's misleading claims about YouTube's dangers, debunked by Sky News, mirror the suppression of vaccine provocation data to protect the "safe and effective" narrative. Australia's strict defamation and hate speech laws already chill open debate, and expanding digital ID systems for age verification could enable surveillance, further stifling discussion of issues like vaccine harms.

The implications are dire. Without acknowledging disease provocation, Australia risks implementing vaccination policies that could exacerbate infections, particularly during outbreaks. For instance, mass COVID-19 boosters without pre-vaccination testing could worsen outcomes for those with asymptomatic infections, as seen in global data. Similarly, HPV vaccination campaigns, which don't screen for existing infections, could increase cervical cancer risks among young women. Public trust, already at historic lows, will erode further if adverse events are dismissed as "coincidence."

Transparency and Reform

To address this forgotten risk, Australia and the global community must act:

1.Acknowledge Disease Provocation: Medical authorities must study and publicise the risks of vaccine-induced immune suppression, integrating historical data into policy decisions.

2.Mandate Pre-Vaccination Testing: Require testing for latent infections (e.g., HPV, COVID-19) before vaccination to prevent exacerbation, as was ignored with HPV vaccines to boost sales.

3.Reform Vaccine Development: Prioritise vaccines with minimal adjuvants and broader antigen profiles, like live attenuated vaccines, which Aaby's studies showed improve overall immunity.

4.Enhance Transparency: Publish adverse event data openly, including VAERS and MyLymeData findings, and subject vaccine policies to independent scrutiny.

5.Protect Free Speech: Strengthen legal protections for discussing vaccine risks, resisting censorship trends that silence dissent, as seen in Australia's social media ban.

Conclusion: Breaking the Cycle of Denial

The evidence for vaccine disease provocation, from typhoid to COVID-19, is overwhelming, yet consistently buried to protect vaccine markets. This denial, rooted in the same hubris that drives Australia's censorship surge, risks public health and trust. By confronting this forgotten science, through rigorous research, transparent policies, and robust free speech protections, Australia can lead the way in exposing the risks of vaccines. Ignoring the lessons of history, from Koch's tuberculin to polio's provocation, invites repeated disasters. The time to act is now, before the next vaccine campaign unwittingly fuels the diseases it aims to prevent.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-the-illnesses