Following from the tragic shooting that claimed the life of a young National Guard soldier and left another fighting for survival, President Donald Trump's latest salvo against unchecked immigration has landed like a thunderbolt. The suspect, an Afghan migrant whose asylum was granted under the Trump administration itself, has become the stark emblem of a system strained to breaking. Trump's response, a sweeping "permanent pause" on migration from "Third World countries," the termination of federal benefits for noncitizens, and vows to deport those deemed "non-compatible with Western Civilization," is not mere rhetoric. It's a clarion call, echoing the mandate millions gave him in 2024. And while the Left clutches at judicial robes, hoping activist judges will tie this effort in knots, they may soon discover that the threads of resistance are fraying faster than they imagine.
This isn't hyperbole; it's the logical endpoint of a presidency forged in the fires of border crises and cultural erosion. Trump's announcement on Truth Social, laced with unapologetic fury, wasn't born in a vacuum. It follows months of executive actions: reinstating and expanding travel bans on 19 nations (including Afghanistan, Somalia, Haiti, and Venezuela), halting asylum decisions nationwide, and ordering a ruthless review of every green card from "countries of concern." These moves build on his first-term playbook, the Muslim Ban upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018, and now, with a more conservative judiciary, they're armoured against the legal barrages that once slowed him. Critics like Rep. Ilhan Omar decry it as ignorance of laws like Temporary Protected Status (TPS), insisting Somali communities in Minneapolis are "safe." But TPS extensions can be, and are being cancelled unilaterally by the executive branch, a power Trump wields with the precision of a surgeon excising a tumour.
The Left's confidence in courtroom victories is understandable but shortsighted. Over 220 federal judges have pushed back on aspects of mass detention, ordering releases and bond hearings in a wave of rebukes. Yet, as the Supreme Court has already signalled in staying lower-court injunctions, the high court, now firmly in Trump's corner, can vapourise these obstacles with a single ruling. Appeals courts are just beginning to wade in, but history shows they bend to the executive's will on national security matters. More crucially, the sheer volume of deportations, targeting millions, overwhelms the system. ICE raids in sanctuary cities, workplace sweeps, and the reversal of Biden-era admissions are already netting thousands weekly. Judges can't litigate every case; the machinery of enforcement grinds on, even amid the noise.
But here's where the surprise lurks: public sentiment isn't just permissive, it's propulsive. Polls paint a picture of an America weary of open borders and cultural silos. A staggering 66% back Trump's deportation policies, even for non-criminal migrants, per recent surveys, a figure that holds across demographics, including independents who've soured on the chaos of the Biden years. Another 54% approve of mass removals outright, with support spiking to 55% for broad operations. Even among Hispanics, where family ties run deep, approval for stricter border control has climbed 17 points since 2024. This isn't fringe fervour; it's mainstream exhaustion with "migrant colonies" like the Haitian surge in Springfield, Ohio, or the Sharia-curious enclaves in Dearborn, Michigan, where assimilation feels like a relic. When NGOs and Democrat leaders howl for military "resistance" to "illegal orders," despite no such orders yet, their echo chamber amplifies division, not unity. Trump doesn't need a majority to prevail; he needs momentum, and the nation is providing it in spades.
Enter the Insurrection Act: the nuclear option that could render court delays quaint. This 1807 law, last dusted off for the 1992 LA riots, empowers the president to deploy federal troops domestically to quell "insurrection" or enforce laws when states can't — or won't. Trump has telegraphed its use since his campaign, framing unchecked migration as an "invasion" overwhelming law enforcement. Paired with the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, it would sidestep the Posse Comitatus Act's bar on military policing, allowing National Guard units not just to shield ICE agents from protesters, but to conduct direct apprehensions and expedite removals. Imagine Guard convoys rolling into Minneapolis's Somali hubs or Springfield's Haitian neighbourhoods — not as barriers, but as the vanguard of a "reverse migration" Trump envisions. Legal challenges would mount, sure — accusations of constitutional overreach from both sides of the aisle. But with 40% of Americans open to military involvement in deportations, and groundswell support poised to surge if riots erupt (as they did in 2020), the political calculus tilts decisively. The Act's invocation doesn't require congressional approval; it's the president's alone, a relic of unchecked executive power in an era when "domestic tranquility" hangs by a thread.
The Left may scoff, banking on injunctions and international outrage from the UN. They envision a repeat of 2017, when travel bans sparked airport chaos and court stays. But 2025 is no 2017. The border's scars, fentanyl deaths, overwhelmed schools, strained hospitals, have radicalised the centre. Trump's first-term deportations, though aggressive, were hamstrung by internal sabotage; now, with loyalists like Stephen Miller and Tom Homan at the helm, the machine hums with purpose. Even if judges slow the pace, the pause on Third World inflows starves the pipeline, while green card revocations and benefit cuts force self-deportation en masse. Naturalised citizens face "denaturalisation" probes for "undermining tranquility," a tool rarely used but now sharpened.
This is self-sabotage for those migrant communities lulled into complacency by Biden's leniency. TPS, visa extensions, asylum — they're shields, not fortresses. Trump's ban isn't a precursor to the Insurrection Act; it's the fuse. Light it with protests or NGO interference, and the explosion will redraw America's map. The courts may delay, but they can't deny the will of a nation reclaiming its sovereignty. The Left's surprise won't be the Act's invocation, it's how little it ultimately matters. America First isn't a slogan; it's the reckoning they've long evaded.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-third-world-immigration-ban-precursor-insurrection-act