The Hong Kong exodus will lead to the West importing a new overclass, to further compete for jobs at the upper levels. Since our local elites support mass migration, this is an example of being hoisted by their own petard.
https://vdare.com/articles/there-s-a-word-for-boris-johnson-s-proposal-to-swamp-u-k-with-chinese-treason
“British Prime Minister Boris Johnson recently announced that Hong Kongers eligible for a British National (Overseas) [BNO] passport—i.e. anyone born before 1997, when China took over Hong Kong—will soon be able to enter Britain without a visa if China officially implements its recently-passed Hong Kong security Law. They will have the right to live and work in the U.K. for five years, despite the current six-month limit, and apply for U.K. citizenship 12 months after that [UK extends immigration rights for 3M eligible Hong Kongers, by Sylvia Hui, AP, July 1, 2020]. In other words, Britons already afflicted by “Asian” grooming gangs and other Third World immigrants must now prepare for the possibility that millions of Hong Kongers will rush in. There is a word for what Johnson is doing: treason. Changing the terms on which BNO holders are allowed into the UK would require legislation. But it’s wildly improbable that Parliament would block such a change. Johnson has a large majority, and the opposition parties would never vote against Electing A New People. Johnson’s rash vow has met with precious little condemnation from the British Main Stream Media and politicians, which tells you how strong a grip Political Correctness has on British elites.
Even Nigel “Mr. Brexit” Farage has confined himself to quibbling about numbers:
Well Boris also, twice as mayor of London, suggested mass amnesties for hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who come to Britain. So when it comes to immigration, Boris is not very conservative at all. On Hong Kong: look, there are many, many, many extremely well-educated, extremely talented people living in Hong Kong, many of whom have a great respect for the United Kingdom. But the thought we can open the doors to three million is just literally impossible. Could we allow, if the situation gets worse, could we allow a fair number of Hong Kongers to come to Britain? Yes, we could. Three million? Just not possible. [Nigel Farage: Trump is taking us back to more traditional alliances, by Amber Athey, Spectator, June 25, 2020] So what’s a “fair number?” A quarter-million? A half-million? 1.5 million? Farage correctly said Johnson is not a conservative. What exactly Johnson is remains a matter of debate, but a liberal internationalist would not be a million miles away from the truth. Johnson has always been soft on immigration, as his spell as Mayor of London illustrates. He frequently referred to his Turkish great-grandfather to establish his multi-cult street-cred [Boris Johnson has a Muslim great-grandfather from Turkey – here’s who he was, by Alex Nelson, Independent, June 24, 2019]. But the real key to Johnson: his monstrous ego. He desperately wanted to be Prime Minister. He would have been quite comfortable in the Blairite Labour Party if that were the fastest route to 10 Downing. Johnson himself has estimated the number of possible immigrants from Hong Kong at three million [Boris Johnson on the Hong Kong crisis: We will meet our obligations, not walk away, by Boris Johnson, The Times, June 3 2020]. And three million is not the worst case. If China treats Hong Kongers really badly, any UK government would certainly permit the immigration of multitudes who are not technically qualified. Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath (the man who fired Enoch Powell from his Shadow Cabinet) set that precedent a half century ago when he permitted 50,000 Ugandan Asians to settle in Great Britain after Idi Amin threatened them [The Ugandan Asians never forget their debt to Britain, by Dolar Popat, Evening Standard, August 15, 2019]. To put the three million in perspective, consider this: Net immigration to the UK in 2019 was 270,000. Johnson’s promise of 3 million Hong Kongers, 4.5 percent of Britain’s population, boosts that number 1,011 percent. That’s the equivalent of the U.S. admitting 14.8 million people.”
Such is the great Replacement wish of modern Britain, the endgame of deracination.
https://vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-i-m-sorry-for-hong-kong-but-u-s-must-not-import-another-overclass
“As the author of a couple of full-length articles on the perils of importing an overclass, I've made my own sympathies plain: Importing an overclass of people who are on average smarter than your own people, is foolish and short-sighted. It's double foolish if the incoming overclass is racially distinctive. You're just storing up trouble for the future. And, on the matter of that cohort of ChiCom agents in among a mass of imported Hong Kongers, any other nation that takes them in should share Taiwan's apprehensions. In fact, we should be more apprehensive than the Taiwanese, whose more-or-less common culture and heritage with the Hong Kongers would make it easier for them to spot the spooks. Bottom line here: If floods of people do leave Hong Kong for a freer life elsewhere, I hope the majority will choose Taiwan. That keys neatly to the fact of Taiwan being their first choice in that Foreign Policy poll. Hey, problem solved!—if Anglosphere politicians will let it be solved.”
Well it is not going to happen, as the Anglo nations, especially the UK, are so far down the path of deracination and elimination of Anglo identity, that they could not resist taking in more Chinese overlords to rule them. Anyway, just keep hoping for a really big asteroid to strike the earth and hit the re-set button. Kids left in the lolly shop for too long develop racial diabetes and obesity.