Charles and Chris, our American correspondents for Alor.org have given a robust defence of the mainstream view on the Charlie Kirk shooting, rejecting one leading conspiracy theory that the real killing shot was by a brown shirt man in the front row:

https://blog.alor.org/debunking-the-brown-shirt-shooter-conspiracy-how-ballistics-evidence-proves-the-lone-gunman-theory-in-charlie-kirk-s-assassination-by-charles-taylor-and-chris-knight-florida.

They argue that there is no evidence of a projectile fired from a squeeze gun which would need to be a low calibre, and where no such slug was found. What killed Kirk was a rifle bullet, a 30-06 calibre, used for shooting large dangerous game like bears. This round served as the US service rifle calibre during World War II, the M1 Garand. This round is more powerful than the .308 round used in the Aussie SLR rifle that John used in the Vietnam war. The point here is that such a round is extremely powerful and easily passes through creatures like bears, even if hitting bone. John during combat saw men get shot in the neck, and never observed a bullet stopping in the neck. He consulted his medic friend who was also in that war, and he never observed it either.

Jimmy Dore has an excellent critique of the official story, where the Robertson supposedly disassembled the rifle after the shot, put it in his pants, fled the scene to the woods, then for some unknown reason, reassembled it. This, he points out, is an absurdity. He speculated that Robertson is a patsy under mind control MK Ultra. Perhaps. But the main issue is the shot itself, supposedly staying in the neck. It is super-unlikely. It could be true, as first-of-its-kind, but we doubt it. So, what happened? At present we do not know, but the official story, just like 9/11 does not make sense. Here are some good videos raising these issues; Jimmy Dore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPBGQp6pH5g&t=244s

Candace Owens:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBkFkg4UNY8

Candace Owen's team has found out that Kirk was not wearing a bullet proof vest, as the firm that previously supplied it did not give it on the day. That raises an insuperable problem for the position taken by the mainstream, and argued for by Charles and Chris, where a deflected round with lower velocity supposedly did the neck penetration.

New video shows Kirk shot from above:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnVMKZxqO_8

https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/who-killed-charlie-kirk-nato-ramps

So, who did it? The story is evolving.