Continuing our anthropology series during this lull before a massive poetical, sorry, political, storm, I consider this interesting piece on the Finnish race, who have special qualities:
https://www.unz.com/gdurocher/the-uniqueness-of-the-finnish-race/
The issue is that most Europeans are thought, by the mainstream, to have descended from three ancestral populations, the European hunter-gatherers, the First Farmers, and groups from the Pontic Steppes:
But that model does not explain the genetics of populations such as the Finns, Estonians, and Hungarians, who share alleles with East Asian populations:
“The Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians are unique in Europe in speaking Finno-Ugric languages. Most European nations speak Indo-European languages, descending from the original language of conquerors hailing from the Pontic Steppe. Genetic studies suggest that Finns are not just uniquely linguistically, but also genetically. Similarly, the Basque are the only other nation in Europe not speaking an Indo-European language and, as I have previously written, their region too appears to be genetically distinct relative to the rest of the French population.
In fact, any East Asian contribution to the Finnish gene pool long predates the Mongols and even the spread of Uralic languages in northern Europe. The scientists estimate that Siberian DNA was present in Finland at least 3,500 years ago.”
However, the Finns are clear, phenotypically a Nordic people, and having some shared alleles with East Asian does not seem to have made much of a contribution to their phenotypes. Thus, the highest percentage of natural blondes in the world is in Finland, 80 percent, and blue eyes, 89 percent:
If the biodiversity of nature is worth preserving, then how much more important is preserving the human biodiversity., especially the world’s most endangered sub-species: Nordic/Nordish Whites?