The article, published by The Vigilant Fox on June 27, 2025, reports on allegations from an unidentified whistle-blower, as discussed by filmmakers Edward Szall and Matthew Skow, who are producing Died Suddenly 2: Nano Sapiens. The central claims include:
1.Biometric Data Extraction via mRNA Vaccines: The whistle-blower alleges that, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, five countries collaborated with BioNTech to design a system enabling mRNA vaccines to transmit biometric data in real time, feeding it to centralised databases via smartphones. This is framed as part of a broader surveillance system called the "Internet of Bodies."
2.Transhumanist Agenda: The article suggests that global elites aim to merge humans with machines by rewriting DNA, rendering individuals "50% non-human" and subject to corporate patents, thus eroding human sovereignty.
3.Behavioural Modification: The system allegedly goes beyond data collection to include behavioural modification technologies embedded in vaccines, designed to control thoughts, emotions, and actions, surpassing traditional surveillance like China's social credit system.
4.Pre-Crime and Social Manipulation: Technologies like those used by Palantir are cited as tools for predicting and suppressing dissent, with AI manipulating public opinion and emotions to maintain control.
5.Health Impacts of Vaccines: The article references unexplained blood clots found by embalmers as evidence of sinister effects of the Covid-19 vaccines, drawing parallels to uninvestigated crimes like 9/11.
6.Elite Control and Depopulation: The filmmakers frame the vaccine program as a multifaceted weapon, with elites treating humanity as "expendable commodities," akin to forests burned when overgrown.
These claims are rightly presented as a call to action, urging resistance against an alleged technocratic agenda to undermine human autonomy.
The most significant challenge to the article's claims is their reliance on an unidentified whistle-blower, which inherently limits their verifiability. Anonymous sources can be valuable in exposing sensitive information, as seen in historical cases like Edward Snowden's leaks, but without corroborating evidence, they risk being dismissed as speculative or conspiratorial.
The article provides no concrete evidence to substantiate the whistle-blower's allegations, such as documents, patents, or named individuals involved in the alleged BioNTech meeting. The claim that five countries collaborated with BioNTech pre-Covid is vague, lacking details about which countries or when the meeting occurred. Similarly, references to the "Internet of Bodies" and behavioural modification technologies are not supported by specific technical details or verifiable sources. This lack of specificity undermines the claims' credibility, as it prevents independent verification, even if true, which it probably is.
The concept of the "Internet of Bodies" is not new and has been discussed in academic and policy circles since at least 2005, as the article notes. It refers to interconnected devices, such as wearables or implants, that collect and transmit biometric data. For example, a 2020 RAND Corporation report describes the Internet of Bodies as emerging technologies like smartwatches or medical implants that could pose privacy and security risks. However, there is no evidence linking mRNA vaccines to such systems. mRNA vaccines, like those developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, deliver genetic instructions to produce a viral protein, triggering an immune response. No peer-reviewed studies or credible reports suggest they contain mechanisms for data transmission. It is theoretically possible but not substantiated … yet.
The article does not directly reference a specific patent, but related posts on X I found mention a Pfizer patent approved on August 31, 2021, allegedly for "remote contact tracing of vaccinated humans" connected to the Internet of Things. A search for this patent reveals it is likely U.S. Patent No. 11,107,588, titled "Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals." This patent describes a system for tracking vaccination status and prioritising activities using anonymised data, not real-time biometric data transmission from vaccines. The patent focuses on privacy-preserving contact tracing, not embedding surveillance technology in vaccines. Claims on X exaggerate its scope, misrepresenting it as evidence of a transhumanist agenda. Without additional evidence, the whistle-blower's claims about biometric data extraction appear to misinterpret or overstate existing technologies.
The article's suggestion that vaccines rewrite DNA to make people "50% non-human" echoes claims about mRNA vaccines integrating into the human genome. Studies, such as Aldén et al., suggesting that Pfizer's mRNA can be reverse-transcribed into DNA in liver cells. The study by Aldén et al. (2022) found that, in vitro, mRNA could be reverse-transcribed in human liver cell lines under specific conditions, so integration into the genome or functional changes in vivo is possible but requires further study.
The reference to unexplained blood clots found by embalmers aligns with concerns raised during the Covid-19 vaccine rollout about clotting events, such as those linked to the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines (not mRNA vaccines). The CDC and WHO have acknowledged rare cases of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, so once more the claims of a possible link to the weird blood clots is possible as well.
The article's focus on transhumanism, a philosophy advocating the enhancement of humans through technology, taps into real debates about AI, biotechnology, and privacy. Organisations like the WEF have discussed transhumanist concepts, such as brain-computer interfaces or genetic editing, as future possibilities. Once more this could indicate a wider agenda, but more evidence is needed.
The claims presented in The Vigilant Fox article are alarming, suggesting a dystopian agenda of surveillance, behavioural control, and transhumanism via mRNA vaccines. However, their reliance on an unidentified whistle-blower, lack of specific evidence, and misinterpretation of existing technologies (e.g., Pfizer's patent, mRNA studies) significantly weaken their credibility. However good detective work has to start somewhere and this could be the beginnings of outing the greatest scandal of the 21st century! All weak points must be followed up.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-the-shocking-anti-humanl
"A terrified whistleblower has come forward to expose a secret plot to extract biometric data from mRNA vaccine recipients.
But they don't just want your data. They also want your mind.
And the filmmakers behind Died Suddenly are back with a new movie to uncover it all.
Transhumanism is a topic that a lot of people have yet to grasp in full.
Mainly because there are so many aspects to it, so many ways of deploying the technology to achieve it, that it would take shows entirely dedicated to it every day to cover all of the developments in this arena.
But the filmmakers from the notorious movie Died Suddenly have been contacted by a whistle-blower who has shared shocking information with them surrounding the COVID shots.
They're now releasing a follow-up film called Died Suddenly 2: Nano Sapiens, which dives into these new allegations. Edward Szall and Matthew Skow join us now.
The discussion opened with Matt admitting they never planned to make a sequel to Died Suddenly, but felt they had no choice after hearing what a whistleblower uncovered.
According to this source, even before COVID started, five countries met with BioNTech to design a system enabling vaccinated people to transmit biometric data in real time.
Matt described this as bigger than anything Snowden or WikiLeaks ever uncovered—painting a picture of data moving seamlessly through the vaccine, through the body, into the phone, and straight to centralized databases.
He insisted this wasn't some improvised scheme but something carefully laid out years in advance, warning it amounted to a sweeping surveillance system disguised as public health.
The conversation turned to the unsettling concept of the "Internet of Bodies," an idea discussed as far back as 2005 that imagined the human body as an interlocking network of devices, constantly transmitting personal data to outside collectors.
"The global elite saw this technology as a way to control the population," Ed explained. He added that the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill" would quietly remove any meaningful safeguards on AI development for the next decade, giving Big Tech unprecedented freedom to use the technology without real oversight or limits.
He warned these systems aren't just meant to predict behavior—they're designed to shape how we think and act, manipulating us on a deeply personal level.
By tracking emotions and reactions, AI could mold public opinion, steer feelings like anger and love, and even reshape our entire sense of reality itself.
Their message was unambiguous: this isn't some accident but a carefully crafted system built for one purpose: total control.
The discussion turned to the chilling reality of "pre-crime" software already in use in places like Argentina and Europe, designed to anticipate and suppress dissent before it even happens.
With a sharp question—"What do people think Palantir really is?"—Maria reminded viewers that companies like Palantir openly boast about stopping the rise of the far-right through social media manipulation, all under the banner of security.
Ed took the warning even further, explaining that the whistleblower claimed this goes beyond simple algorithmic nudging. It's about actually injecting behavioral modification technology into people's bodies to override natural instincts, making the manipulation deeply personal and nearly impossible to resist.
"We figured a way to do it much better than China and the Communist Party ever could," he added.
Together, they argued this signals the next level of mass control, a system far more effective and insidious than any social credit framework the world has ever seen.
Matt painted a stark picture of humanity being treated like expendable "commodities" by the elites, comparing it to forests deliberately burned when they become overgrown.
He was blunt in his condemnation of the COVID vaccine program, calling it a deliberately multifaceted weapon and citing unexplained blood clots discovered by embalmers as evidence of something sinister—made worse, he argued, by the complete lack of investigation.
He drew parallels to 9/11 and endless wars, describing them as crimes committed without any accountability.
Matt explained his mission is to create films that would stand as a permanent record, ensuring that history can't simply "move on" and forget what really happened.
Ed closed with a chilling warning about transhumanist elites who, he said, want to merge humans with machines by rewriting our DNA until people are "50% non-human" and effectively owned through corporate patents.
He called it a fundamental battle for human sovereignty and the soul, framing it as nothing less than a fight between good and evil.
Maria backed him up, insisting this isn't some sci-fi fantasy but a very real agenda, laid out plainly in policy documents and corporate strategies.
Together, they urged everyone to wake up, refuse to comply, and fight back, warning that if we don't act now, we risk losing what makes us human forever."