Almost all of the postmodern gender agenda is based upon people having the comfort of a modern society, which insulates them from nature. Suddenly fling a gaggle of feminists into the wild, and we would see very different behaviours, as there would be a longing for the hard masculinity they so despise to lead them out of danger:
https://personalliberty.com/will-manliness-make-comeback-2018/
In fact, the whole of the politically correct agenda is founded upon violence, namely having a system of strong men with guns ready to defend the system with violence:
http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2011/03/violence-is-golden/
“Violence is the final answer to the question, “Or else what?”
Violence is the gold standard, the reserve that guarantees order. In actuality, it is better than a gold standard, because violence has universal value. Violence transcends the quirks of philosophy, religion, technology and culture. People say that music is a universal language, but a punch in the face hurts the same no matter what language you speak or what kind of music you prefer. If you are trapped in a room with me and I grab a pipe and gesture to strike you with it, no matter who you are, your monkey brain will immediately understand “or else what.” And thereby, a certain order is achieved.
The practical understanding of violence is as basic to human life and human order as is the idea that fire is hot. You can use it, but you must respect it. You can act against it, and you can sometimes control it, but you can’t just wish it away. Like wildfire, sometimes it is overwhelming and you won’t know it is coming until it is too late. Sometimes it is bigger than you. Ask the Cherokee, the Inca, the Romanovs, the Jews, the Confederates, the barbarians and the Romans. They all know “Or else what.”
The basic acknowledgement that order demands violence is not a revelation, but to some it may seem like one. The very notion may make some people apoplectic, and some will furiously attempt to dispute it with all sorts of convoluted and hypothetical arguments, because it doesn’t sound very “nice.” But something doesn’t need to be “nice” in order for it to be true. Reality doesn’t bend over to accommodate fantasy or sentimentality.
Our complex society relies on proxy violence to the extent that many average people in the private sector can wander through life without really having to understand or think deeply about violence, because we are removed from it. We can afford to perceive it as a distant, abstract problem to be solved through high-minded strategy and social programming. When violence comes knocking, we simply make a call, and the police come to “stop” the violence. Few civilians really take the time to think that what we are essentially doing is paying an armed band protection money to come and do orderly violence on our behalf. When those who would do violence to us are taken peacefully, most of us don’t really make the connection, we don’t even assert to ourselves that the reason a perpetrator allows himself to be arrested is because of the gun the officer’s hip or the implicit understanding that he will eventually be hunted down by more officers.”
Something constitutes a law because it is the command of an authority who has the capacity to make you obey. Violence is indeed “golden,” so behind the present oestrogen regime, must lurk manliness to back it up, otherwise it would just fall into a puddle of its own protoplasm, or its own bs:
http://www.shtfplan.com/conspiracy-fact-and-theory/liberal-media-new-years-resolution-huffington-post-editor-calls-for-women-to-band-together-to-kill-all-men_12302017