On August 31, Australians in cities across the country will march under a simple banner: to reclaim their nation. The "March for Australia" protests, condemned in advance as "un-Australian" and smeared with labels like "far-Right" and "neo-Nazi," have one central message: mass immigration has consequences. And the most important of those consequences isn't about GDP. It's about identity.
For decades, political leaders and their media allies have told Australians that immigration is purely an economic tool. More workers, more growth, more houses we somehow never build. Commentators insist the debate must stay in that box: labour shortages, housing, welfare. But the box is a lie. Economics is secondary. A nation is not just a spreadsheet. It is a people. And a people are defined by culture, memory, and heritage, not quarterly growth rates, as the economic reductionists seem to think.
The truth is obvious: Australia is being remade. In 2024, nearly one in three Australians were born overseas. Migration from India, China, and the Philippines has surged. Projections suggest that by 2050, no single ethnic or cultural group will form a majority here. What does that mean for "Australian identity"? Elites shrug and say it doesn't matter. Ordinary people aren't so sure.
This isn't about hating migrants. It's about asking the question any healthy society should ask: who are we becoming? Every nation has limits to how much demographic change it can absorb before cohesion frays. Yet governments have accelerated migration to record highs, half a million net arrivals in a single year, while ignoring the cultural and social consequences. Why? Because the global economic machine demands growth. Because "diversity" has been sanctified as an unquestionable good. Because anyone who objects is smeared as a racist. Diversity is the sacred cow of this regime.
But smears don't erase reality. Housing is unaffordable. Schools and hospitals are strained. Cities are overcrowded. Social trust is eroding. People feel like strangers in their own suburbs. These aren't "far-Right talking points." They are lived experiences.
History offers warnings. In Britain, anger over asylum hotels and unchecked migration spilled into the streets, drawing both everyday citizens and extremists. Violence followed, but the rage didn't appear from nowhere, it was cultivated by decades of elite indifference. Australia risks the same path. Labelling everyone who marches as a neo-Nazi won't prevent that; it will guarantee it. The media will do this for their globalist masters even if every protest sign was a piece of economics.
The March for Australia will not be perfect; radicals will appear and the media will photograph them, even if they have to hire rent-a-crowd. No grassroots movement is. But waiting for a spotless, media-approved protest is like waiting for rain in the desert. It never comes. The point is that Australians are beginning to push back. They are saying that their nation is more than a labour market, more than a multicultural brand, more than a playground for globalist experiments.
This is the choice: either the immigration debate acknowledges the central issue — identity — or it will remain poisoned by silence and contempt. A people who cannot speak about who they are will not remain a people for long. People in the UK are well aware of this, and so should Aussies.
See you at the rally! I'm the old fat, baldguy with the walking stick.