It is good to see some critical reflection about the dark side of immigration, especially in the light of compounding absurdities, such as the suggestion of using chemicals such as oxytocin to make Whites love refugees, migrants, transgenders, and anyone the globalists want them to like:
Realities like this need to be drugged away, Brave New World style:
Germans are one of the most cucked, deracinated people on Earth, happily embracing their collective oblivion. But, then again, Sweden has become so Islamised that it is being regarded by some strategic theorists as a greater threat than even Russia:
“Lillrank saw Putin and Russia as the biggest security risk to Finland. Now Professor Paul Lillrank has changed. Sweden is probably a bigger threat, he thinks. The reason is the Muslim mass immigration.
According to Lillrank, Sweden has proportionally received more immigrants than any other OECD country. Additionally, the worst is the integration of them.
Paul Lillrank believes Sweden is turning into an insecure parallel society with an ethnic subclass. Multiculturalism starts conflicts, and politicians in Sweden have had a great deal of humor, he says. The labor market is not adapted to low-skilled asylum immigrants, something Swedish politicians do not want to understand. When resources are not enough to maintain the Swedish welfare state, the authorities say they do not understand why.
Swedish municipalities are so bad at managing returning IS terrorists that they choose to “love bomb” them with financial contributions and priority in the country’s housing queue, the professor points out.
“There is a real risk that Sweden will turn into a failed state with ghettos where Swedish law no longer applies and the police have no control over the situation. Democracy is out of play when the authorities violate the migration law and the police are looking through the fingers of illegal immigrants. It is unthinkable that Sweden becomes a greater security risk to Finland than Russia, “Paul Lillrank writes in HBL.
According to Paul Lillrank, the Swedish political elite stands out to be a moral superpower, but in reality it is increasingly resembling a collection of fools with the same “self-destructive madness” that Karl XII exhibited in his last years as a Swedish king, he writes.
The Norwegians and Danes, who have spoken about border controls against Sweden, have already realized the serious threat from neighboring countries. Paul Lillrank believes that Finns must understand the same thing.
Lillrank says he wishes that there could be some calming reading about Sweden, but it does not exist.”
All this and more from that giver of all things, immigration.
Jennifer Oriel writing in The Australian, August 21, 2017, p. 12, while giving the mandatory “Australia’s migration story is oh, so fantastic,” does rip into Europe’s open borders immigration, which she argues facilitated jihad:
“Oxytocin might offer relief from denial about open-border policy and the development of Islamism as a Western condition, but the truth does too. In 2004, a terror cell orchestrated the slaughter of 191 innocents in Madrid. Of the three men convicted of murder and attempted murder in the Madrid bombings, one was a Spaniard and two were Moroccan. In the years that followed, Spanish authorities uncovered several terrorist plots by Moroccan immigrants. On Saturday, The Sun newspaper reported that last week’s attacks were orchestrated by a terror cell that includes about a dozen Moroccans recently returned from Syria.
Should Eurocrats find the link between mismanaged migration and terrorism unclear still, consider Brussels, Paris, Nice, London Bridge and Borough Market. Or go transatlantic for a tour of the Boston bombings before heading Down Under where four recent fatal terrorist attacks were perpetrated by refugees.”
Well, how then is wonderful migrant Australia any different, since it has the same open borders policies? We are simply on the shoreline, holding our plastic spades and pails, innocently waiting for the waves to pound our plump White faces into the sand:
In the light of reading this, you would surely concur that the “pounding” metaphor is not misplaced, would you not?