The American Thinker article "Globalize the Second Amendment" hits a nerve, arguing that the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of the right to bear arms isn't just an American quirk — it's a universal human imperative. In an era of rising crime, terrorist threats extending this right globally isn't radical; it's essential. It's a grand idea whose time has unequivocally arrived, empowering citizens everywhere to defend life, liberty, and dignity against criminals, home invaders and terrorists. Let's unpack why globalising the Second Amendment is not only wise but long overdue, drawing from the article's insights and broader realities.
The Core Thesis: Arms as a Natural Human Right
At its heart, the Second Amendment recognises an innate truth: The right to self-defence is a natural right, predating governments and unalienable by them. The article nails this, declaring that any regime disarming its people is "automatically illegitimate." Gun control doesn't target the root causes — misuse by criminals or societal breakdowns — but strips law-abiding folks of their best tool for protection. As the author puts it, "The problem is never the guns, but the people who are misusing the firearms and the government entities that refuse to prosecute criminals."
Globalising this means pressuring nations to dismantle barriers like permits, registrations, and bans, allowing citizens to arm themselves freely. Why now? Because threats are global: From jihadist attacks to criminal predators, unarmed populations are sitting ducks. It's not about vigilantism; it's about restoring balance, ensuring personal survival in dangerous time, where as the Bondi massacre showed, sudden death could strike at any time, without instant police defence.
Globalising the Amendment means U.S. leaders, like President Trump, using diplomatic muscle to advocate for armed self-defence worldwide. Imagine a resolution affirming this right, or trade deals tied to gun reforms. It's grand because it flips the script: Instead of exporting democracy through bombs, export empowerment through rights.
Real-World Examples: Successes and Failures
The article shines with contrasts. Take Switzerland: High gun ownership (thanks to mandatory conscription) pairs with low crime, proving armed societies can be polite and safe. The Czech Republic recently enshrined self-defence rights in its constitution, a beacon for Europe. Argentina's President Javier Milei lifted a 35-year ban on semi-automatic rifles, sparking a surge in ownership and safety. Israel, post-October 7 horrors, loosened rules to arm civilians — because when seconds count, police are hours away. All sensible policies, and Australia should follow these nations, not go in the opposite direction!
Now, the failures — and here's where Aussies come in. The 2025 Bondi Beach terrorist murder spree left innocents defenceless, a direct fallout from Australia's 1996 "gun buyback" (read: confiscation) after Port Arthur. The article calls it a "massive gun confiscation program nearly thirty years ago, masquerading as a gun buyback proposal. There was nothing voluntary about it." Imagine if bystanders had firearms to stop the assailants, instead of one brave man having to face a gunman unarmed? Instead, strict laws left them vulnerable, echoing global patterns where gun control disarms the good guys while criminals thrive. Down here in Australia, we've bought the narrative that fewer guns mean safety, but stats show otherwise: Violent crime persists, and governments arrest people for discussing immigration or gender issues, hinting at creeping tyranny. Aussies are behind, yes, but catching up could mean reclaiming sovereignty in an uncertain world.
Why Now? The Timing is Ripe
The idea's time has come because threats evolve faster than policies. Radical jihadism, terrorism, cyber warfare, and authoritarian resurgence demand personal resilience.
Globally, momentum builds: From Latin America's self-defence movements to Europe's awakening amid social crises. Empowered individuals innovate more, fear less, and build better futures. Globalising the Second Amendment isn't American imperialism — it's human liberation.
Conclusion: A Call for Freedom
Globalising the Second Amendment is grand, timely, and transformative. It restores natural rights, thwarts tyranny, and saves lives, as evidenced by successes in Switzerland, Czechia, Argentina, and Israel — and failures like Australia's Bondi tragedy. Aussies might be behind, mate, but from Hobart to Alice Springs, it's worth rethinking: In a world gone mad, an armed populace is the ultimate insurance. Let's pressure leaders to make this a global reality — before the next terrorist threat strikes. Freedom isn't free; sometimes, it needs defending, one right at a time. And if we have no right to self-defence, which for women and others requires an equalising weapon, we have no rights at all!
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/globalize_the_second_amendment.html