Remember when "1-in-1,000-year" storms were supposed to happen... well, once in a millennium? This past week, the United States had four of them. Yes, four separate catastrophic rainfall events, each deemed a statistical freak, each destroying homes, farms, and infrastructure, in Texas, North Carolina, New Mexico, and Illinois. Oh, and if that wasn't strange enough, a little town in Vermont, Sutton, just got clobbered by "biblical flooding" on the exact same date for the third year in a row.
Coincidence? Or coordination?
The mainstream media rushed to assure us that these storms are just part of "climate chaos." Weather is getting weirder, they say, because carbon emissions make the clouds angry. The oceans are upset. Your gas stove is to blame. Meanwhile, elite climate jet-setters fly to climate conferences in private jets to tell farmers to give up meat, tractors, and land.
The real joke? These so-called "1-in-1,000-year events" are happening so often, the phrase now has all the credibility of "two weeks to flatten the curve." Let's indulge a thought crime: what if these floods aren't entirely natural?
After all, weather modification isn't science fiction. It's policy. It's history. The U.S. government seeded clouds in Vietnam under Project Popeye. China regularly modifies weather ahead of national events. And even now, geoengineering proposals are discussed openly by think tanks, universities, and Davos types.
So if cloud seeding or other manipulations were used on, say, a test scale—or a more strategic one, would anyone tell us? And more importantly: who benefits from farmland underwater? There's a pattern emerging here, and it's not just in the weather.
In the last few years:
Farms get flooded or scorched.
Supply chains get "disrupted."
Small landholders get pushed to the brink.
Big corporations buy up the land at pennies on the dollar.
Meanwhile, "climate-friendly" 15-minute cities, vertical farms, and synthetic meat labs get billions in funding.
It almost looks like a transfer of territory, from the ruggedly independent rural world to the sleek,zones of the urban technocracy. And when the very same day floods your town for three years running, like in Sutton, Vermont, one begins to wonder: are we being nudged off the land?
Let's be blunt: climate disaster is the perfect pretext.
Need emergency powers? Just declare a climate emergency.
Want to restrict travel? Blame the weather.
Want to reset land ownership? Flood it.
Want to move people into smart cities? Call the countryside "unsustainable."
Floods, fires, droughts, they can all be used to justify what no democratic vote ever would. Some will say this is all tinfoil hat talk. That the weather's just angry and unpredictable. That the experts know best. Fine. But isn't it at least curious that the more erratic the climate gets, the more powerful central authorities become?
The more damage to the land, the more non-farming billionaires buy it. And the more disaster we see, the more digital tracking, global governance, and personal sacrifice we're asked to accept. At some point, even the reasonable sceptic must ask:
Is this chaos merely natural, or is someone, somewhere, steering the storm?
You don't need to believe in HAARP or secret weather satellites to see that climate panic is being weaponised. And as four freak floods in one week remind us, there is no such thing as coincidence when there's money, power, and land involved.
If you still think it's just the rain, maybe it's time to step outside, and smell the New World Order Agenda 2030.
https://michaeltsnyder.substack.com/p/this-is-not-normal-we-just-had-four
"I had never heard of four "1-in-1,000-year storms" occurring during a single week.
But according to NBC News, that is precisely what just happened…
First the river rose in Texas. Then, the rains fell hard over North Carolina, New Mexico and Illinois.
In less than a week, there were at least four 1-in-1,000-year rainfall events across the United States — intense deluges that are thought to have roughly a 0.1% chance of happening in any given year.
I have already written quite a bit about the horrific flooding that we saw in Texas, and there has been a lot of speculation that it may have been caused by cloud seeding.
But Texas was not the only state to experience dangerous flooding. North Carolina, New Mexico and Illinois also got hammered…
Days later, on Sunday, Tropical Storm Chantal drenched parts of North Carolina. Extensive flooding was reported across the central portion of the state, with some areas receiving nearly 12 inches of rain in only 24 hours. Local officials are still confirming the total number of deaths from the flooding, all while the region is under another flood watch Thursday.
In New Mexico on Tuesday, at least three people were killed by devastating flash floods that swept through the remote mountain village of Ruidoso, about 180 miles south of Albuquerque.
And in Chicago that same day, 5 inches of rain fell in only 90 minutes over Garfield Park, prompting multiple rescues on the west side of the city.
One historic flood can be dismissed as "just a coincidence".
But four historic floods in a single week?
In addition to the floods mentioned above, the town of Sutton, Vermont just got hit by major flooding on July 10th for the third consecutive year…
A quaint Vermont town has been inundated with biblical flooding on the same day for the third consecutive year, causing havoc for locals.
In an eerie case of Deja-vu the town of Sutton was hit with five inches of rain over a few hours on Thursday afternoon, according to the National Weather Service (NWS).
The quick downpour caused flash flooding and left parts of the community severely damaged.
What are the odds?
If your town keeps getting hit by "biblical flooding" on the exact same day year after year, perhaps it is time to consider relocating."
https://thetruthaboutcancerofficial.substack.com/p/the-texas-floods-natural-disaster
"We used to live in Spring Branch, Texas—right on the edge of the Hill Country, where rolling limestone hills glow golden at sunset, where the Guadalupe River winds through oak-studded valleys, and where tight-knit communities thrive in the quiet beauty of rural Texas. Over the past week, that same Hill Country has been devastated by historic flooding.
The official narrative? "Just another climate disaster™ - pay no attention to the weather modification patents."
The corporate media's chorus? "Our hearts are broken (but our scripts are pre-approved)! Thoughts and prayers (but don't you dare think or ask about geoengineering)!"
Because clearly, we should trust the same people who:
1.Swore Hunter's laptop was "Russian disinformation" (until it wasn't)
Insisted lab leaks were "racist conspiracy theories" (until they weren't)
Promised Iraq had WMDs (until...oh wait)
But sure, this time they're being honest about the floods being "100% natural" – despite the Texas Dept of Licensing & Regulation website describing active "rain enhancement operations" (TDLR's words, not mine). What are the odds?
Then there's the North American Weather Modification Council, which proudly boasts about its "environmentally friendly" weather manipulation programs. They've perfected the art of making rain on demand, all in the name of "agricultural relief," they claim, while conveniently ignoring how these technologies can be weaponized.
Which brings us to the only part of this story that isn't up for debate: The broken bodies being pulled from the mud. The families who will never be whole again. The children who went to bed in a peaceful Hill Country and woke up in a war zone.
Let's start with what matters: The victims "they" can't gaslight away.
Grandparents drowned in their living rooms, their final moments spent clutching family photos as floodwaters smashed through windows. Children—some as young as six—torn from their parents' arms by the raging currents, their tiny bodies found miles downstream. Among the most heartbreaking losses were the young girls from Camp Mystic, a beloved summer retreat where generations of Texas children made lifelong memories. These vibrant souls—girls who should have been roasting marshmallows and singing campfire songs—were instead swept away in the darkness.
First responders are still pulling bodies from the mud, risking their lives while soulless bureaucrats in air-conditioned offices tweet empty platitudes about "resilience." These victims were real people, not just numbers for some FEMA press release or fodder for the disaster capitalism grifters already circling like vultures.
Yet before the grieving families could even bury their dead, the media ghouls—the same ones who've lied about everything from lab leaks to election fraud—were already shrieking in perfect unison: "CLOUD SEEDING? GEOENGINEERING? DON'T BE ABSURD!" As if the same liars who've been wrong about EVERYTHING suddenly deserve our trust when billion-dollar weather modification programs are openly bragged about by groups like the North American Weather Modification Council.
Fox 26 Houston practically tripped over itself to publish an article interview with Senator Ted Cruz, "'Zero Evidence' of Weather Modification in Kerrville Flooding Disaster," a headline so aggressively defensive it might as well have been written by a CDC official during COVID-19. Seriously, when did the media start sprinting this hard to debunk a theory, and use quotes from a Senator like Ted Cruz to support their theory?
Fox 26 Houston couldn't wait to trot out Senator Ted Cruz - the same man who famously fled to Cancun during a Texas power crisis - as their expert witness on weather science. Their headline, "'Zero evidence' of weather modification in Kerrville flooding disaster," was delivered with such over-the-top conviction you'd think Cruz had personally inspected every Texas cloud. Heck, it might as well have been written by a CDC "official" during COVID-19. Seriously, when did the media start sprinting this hard to debunk a theory, and use quotes from a Senator like Ted Cruz to support their theory?
Oh, wait—we know precisely when…
Every…
Single…
Time…
The script is stale at this point. Lahaina burns to the ground? "Just erratic winds." Hurricane Helene magically intensifies overnight? "Natural inland variability." Now Texas drowns—in a region where weather modification patents, smart city blueprints, and DARPA-funded geoengineering programs all converge—and we're supposed to believe it's all one big coincidence?
Maybe it is.
Maybe not.
While grieving families bury their dead, the same blue-check fact-checkers who swore lab leaks were "racist conspiracy theories" and Hunter's laptop was "Russian disinformation" are already workshopping their next masterpieces of narrative control, mocking anyone who asks questions about this horrible disaster.
Let's be clear: If human hands manipulated those floodwaters through cloud seeding, atmospheric tampering, or other weather weapons, then we're not looking at tragedy - we're looking at premeditated mass murder. The architects of such an atrocity would make terrorists look like amateurs. These would be soulless butchers who calculated the drowning of families in their homes, the sweeping away of children at camp, and the destruction of generations-old livelihoods - all to serve some hidden agenda.
The capability to weaponize weather exists. The historical precedent for such atrocities exists. But the most incriminating evidence may not be found in flood patterns or weather data, but in the media's hysterical overreaction to anyone daring to ask questions. When every corporate outlet suddenly runs near-identical pieces declaring "Move along, nothing suspicious here!" within days of the disaster, before any kind of investigation has occurred, we're not seeing independent journalism.
We're watching a scripted performance.
They want you to dismiss any connection to weather manipulation as "crazy conspiracy theory," even as:
Bill Gates pours millions into stratospheric aerosol injection programs while lecturing us about climate change
There are numerous patents on weather control technology (Patent #1619183, Patent# 2045865, Patent# 2591988, Patent# 3437502, Patent# 3531310)
DARPA openly brags about its climate control research while pretending it could never be weaponized.
The hypocrisy would be laughable if it weren't so deadly serious.
They'll keep shouting "natural disaster!" They'll keep mocking "conspiracy theorists!" They'll blame everything from climate change to bad luck before admitting the terrifying truth - that someone, somewhere, has been playing God with our weather.
So we must ask hard questions:
Why is cloud seeding perfectly legal, but questioning its consequences dismissed as paranoia?
Why do military documents discuss weather warfare while journalists pretend such capabilities are science fiction?
Who stands to profit from these so-called natural disasters when the rebuilding contracts are awarded?
Even as we write these words, disaster strikes again—this time in New Mexico. Ruidoso lies in ruins, its streets turned to rivers, its homes swept away in an instant. To the families searching for loved ones in the mud, to the children who lost everything: your pain is our pain. Our hearts and prayers are with our brothers and sisters in Texas and New Mexico.
The waters will drain away, but the stain of deception remains permanent. We stand at a crossroads: accept the lies and wait for the next catastrophe to claim your town or rise up with the fury of the flood itself to demand answers. The dead can't speak—so we must roar for them. Your community is already in the crosshairs; the only question is whether you'll see it coming.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/07/cloud_seeding_responsible_for_tragic_texas_flood.html
Cloud-seeding responsible for tragic Texas flood?
By Eric Utter
Texas's flash floods in populated areas have been an unusually harsh disaster, leaving many to ask why it happened.
Was it cloud-seeding?
According to Blaze News, Augustus Doricko, the founder and CEO of Rainmaker, a U.S.-based climate technology company specializing in cloud seeding has been directly blamed by many for the Texas floods after it was discovered that his company seeded clouds in Texas just two days before the torrential rain began.
So, was there any correlation between the two events?
Glenn Beck invited Doricko to appear on his "The Glenn Beck Program" to find out. And so he did.
Doricko, perhaps predictably, warned against banning the technology outright, saying that not only could a ban "prevent farmers from having water," but would also sentence the U.S. to fall even further behind China, which has an enormous weather modification program.
He stated: "The United States a year ago spent $2.4 million on cloud-seeding research," adding that "China has an annual budget of $1.4 billion for cloud seeding and weather modification." He also noted that China has "35,000 employees in their weather modification office," and "two universities that offer bachelor's degrees in weather engineering."
Yet, Doricko stressed the need to "be cautious" in these endeavors so as to "mitigate any potential for any damage." He also told Beck that "Geoengineering is a global climatic intervention designed to either cool the planet down or create reflective high-altitude clouds."
My wife and I fight over the thermostat setting in our house. Neither of us, however, believes we have the right to determine what temperature our neighbor's house should be set to. Or all the other houses in our neighborhood. Or city.
So, who the hell gets to control the planet's thermostat? What if France wants a constant 72-degree temperature, but Norway wants it set at 68 degrees? Or The People's Republic of the Congo is more comfortable at 80?
Who adjudicates that kind of dispute?
I'm sure Mr. Doricko and Rainmaker aren't to blame for the recent Texas flood.
But geoengineering is another story altogether. This practice should be banned outright. Any nation caught trying to affect the globe's weather should be ostracized and roundly punished via sanctions, boycotts, tariffs, and a variety of other measures as necessary.
Talkin' to you, China.
No nation — or world body -- should get to unilaterally decide how it wants to attempt to alter the Earth's weather patterns.
To do so is crazy.
What could possibly go wrong?
"Whoops, sorry, Ice Age! Our bad! Sorry your crops failed!" Or, "Well, we didn't expect that to happen!"
We want to combat the heinous evil of (alleged) "man-caused climate change" by pulling out all the stops to foster man-caused climate change?
Is anyone else a bit uncomfortable with this idea? Seems a tad ironic.
Let's be honest for a moment. We humans have enough difficulty doing mundane things. Nearly every day something we do around the home -- or in an office, restaurant or bar -- has unintended consequences.
The Biden administration (sort of accidentally?) left billions of dollars of military equipment in Afghanistan, equipment now able to be directed at us or our friends. China (sort of accidentally?) unleashed the coronavirus on the world, which resulted in unprecedented abridgement of freedoms and human dignity. China is largely responsible for the floating garbage/plastic island in the Pacific Ocean, as well. And, in 2023, China either sent a spy balloon across the United States or, if you care to believe the Chinese government, lost control of a weather balloon.
I'm not trusting China to modify the planet's weather and to get it "juuust right."
So, a nation suffering from drought wants to seed the clouds, but, two nations over, they are experiencing flooding. Should the former be able to cloud-seed? There are seeds being sown here: seeds of conflict.
Call me a skeptic, but I trust in God more than I trust in Xi Jinping, Mark Carney, or Bill Gates."