First things first:
“The British government has admitted that no Christians were taken among the Syrian refugees flown into Britain recently, with the Home Office rejected the handful of non-Muslims selected for resettlement by the United Nations. Despite the persecution of Christians at the hands of Islamic extremists in Syria having been declared genocide by the U.S., the European Union (EU) and even British MPs themselves in a 2016 parliamentary vote, the 1,112 Syrians that Britain resettled in the first three months of 2018 consisted only of Muslims. The Barnabas Fund, an aid agency which supports Christians persecuted for their faith, obtained the figures via Freedom of Information requests after “a protracted tussle with the Home Office”, The Sunday Times reports."
https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/29/syrian-muslim-uk-rejects-christians/
So, with the official narrative about the need to save the lives of desperate refugees, a point made strongly by the scores of Left women pro-migrant protesters (“refugees not racists”), how is all of this squared? It seems like there is a strong Muslim bias in the refugee lottery. Could there be an agenda to make the West Islamic? No, that would be conspiratorial. Hence, the goal must surely be to bring in the next generation of rocket scientists who will provide pension and health care money via tax revenue to an ageing boomer population, who did what they could to “give peace a chance.” Just “imagine” that.