Patrick Colbeck has compiled a mass of material on the US electoral fraud issue, from a computer geek perspective. I don’t understand much of it, but here it is for the record.

https://letsfixstuff.org/2021/04/modem-chips-embedded-in-voting-system-computer-motherboards/

“While all of the attention has been focused upon manipulation of election results via software, there has been very little attention paid to hardware. Malware can be embedded in hardware as well as software. That’s why the following discovery unearthed by Attorney Matt DePerno during his investigation into Antrim County election fraud is so important.

What was discovered?

SEE Exhibit 6 in Antrim County Lawsuit

What does the Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip do?

SEE ES&S DS200 Operators Guide

Why is this important?

https://letsfixstuff.org/2021/04/antrim-county-the-thread-that-unravels-2020-election-theft/

Why is Antrim County even in the news in the first place?

On election night, this traditionally “red” county flipped overwhelmingly to “blue” raising flags among citizens who could attest to an overwhelming majority of Trump signs in front of homes throughout the county. The reported results featured a 3,260 vote margin for “blue” candidate Biden out of a total of 16,047 votes cast. It just didn’t make sense to most political observers.

Why is Antrim County so important to attempts to expose 2020 election fraud?

It helps paint a “3D” picture of the election.

Let’s explore each of these topics.

Discovery

November 23, 2020: Complaint was filed by Matt DePerno on behalf of Antrim County resident Bill Bailey. Case 2020-9238 CZ was opened. NOTE: You can follow the status of Case 2020-9238 CZ from the court website.

December 9, 2020: Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson intervenes on behalf of Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy. By intervening in the case, the MI Secretary of State opened the door to “discovery” regarding the Secretary of State’s role in the Antrim County election.

March 16, 2021: Subpoenas were issued to the clerks for the following counties: Antrim, Barry, Charlevoix, Grand Traverse, Kent, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne.

April 12, 2021: Hearing scheduled to compel recipients of subpoenas to comply with requests.

June 8-9, 2021: Non-Jury Trial for court case scheduled.

Data

A total of four unique vote tallies were conducted in Antrim County.

On November 3, the Antrim County Clerk posted that Joe Biden had defeated Donald Trump by 3,260 votes out of a total of 16,047 votes cast.

On November 5, the Antrim County Board of Canvassers posted results that indicated that Donald Trump defeated Joe Biden by 2,494 votes out of a new total of 18,059 votes cast.

On November 21, the Antrim County Board of Canvassers posted the official results that indicated that Donald Trump defeated Joe Biden by 3,788 votes out of a new total of 16,044 votes cast.

On December 17, a hand recount (initially portrayed as an audit) was conducted that revealed that Donald Trump defeated Joe Biden by 3,800 votes out of a new total of 15,962 votes cast.

Between November 3 and December 17, Donald Trump received an additional 5,250 votes while Joe Biden saw a 1,810 vote decrement for a net swing of 7,060 votes.

ntrim County Vote Tallies

Douglas G Frank, PhD, Presentation

Exhibit 4 Doug Frank Report

Key assertions:

ASOG Report

ASOG Report [Redacted Version]

Key assertions:

Halderman Report

Analysis of the Antrim County, Michigan November 2020 Election Incident.

Key assertions:

NOTE: Due to many discrepancies between Halderman Report on Antrim County and his previous assertions regarding electronic voting systems, a much more detailed assessment of this report is planned for a subsequent post.

Jim Penrose Report

Exhibit 6 Jim Penrose Report

Key assertions:

Cyber Ninja Report

Exhibit 7 Cyber Ninja Report

Key assertions:

Benjamin Cotton Report

Exhibit 8 Benjamin Cotton Report

Key assertions:

Other declarations:

Decertification

The data provided indicates serious breaches in the chain of custody regarding election artifacts. In fact, there is evidence that every link in the chain of custody was broken in Antrim County. These links include the Qualified Voter File (QVF), poll books, ballots, and vote tallies.

The Qualified Voter File demonstrates clear evidence that there are over 25% more registered voters than eligible voters. The analysis of Dr. Frank indicates that votes were assigned to ballots in a manner than indicates machine-based algorithms were used thereby invalidating the chain of custody for poll books. The volatility in the number of ballots in four successive recounts indicates insufficient control of ballot chain of custody. The connection of tabulation equipment to the internet demonstrates insufficient control of the vote tally chain of custody. Individually, they would be grounds for the decertification of the election results. Collectively, they demonstrate significant malfeasance and an imperative for the decertification of the election results including down ballot contests.

The term “certification” as it pertains to election results denotes that the election was conducted in accordance with acceptable procedures. Certifications of elections are performed by a Board of Canvassers featuring members of both principle political parties. It is not clear under Michigan election law, but, per the County Board of Canvassers Manual released by the Secretary of State, the purpose of Canvassers is to verify the proper completion of records related to the election.  Another term for the verification of the completion of proper completion of records is “audit”.

The Michigan Election Security Advisory Commission overseen by the Secretary of State recognizes two types of audits:

  1. Procedural: Verify whether jurisdictions properly followed election procedures
  2. Tabulation: Verify that votes were counted correctly

While it is unclear in Michigan election law, the “proper completion of records” would seem to more closely align with a procedural audit as opposed to a simple tabulation audit. In this light, any evidence that procedures integral to the preservation of the chain of custody were not “properly completed” would be grounds for decertification of the election results. Furthermore, any evidence that the electronic voting system featured software or hardware which was NOT certified would also be grounds for decertification.

In most states, including Michigan, there are laws on the books which invoke Quo Warranto in case of election fraud or error. In fact, there are recent precedents for the decertification of election results. In Mississippi, Judge Jeff Weill ordered a new election as a result of evidence of fraud and criminal activity in a State Senate raceIn New Jersey, Judge Ernest Caposela ordered a new election for city council due to an election that was “rife with mail in vote procedural violations”.

Decertification does not need to proceed through the court system for all races. Under Article II of the United States Constitution, the state legislatures have plenary (i.e. absolute) authority regarding the assignment of Presidential electors.

Conclusion

The Discovery in Antrim County resulted in Data that would justify the Decertification of the Antrim County election results.

If there is evidence of the same issues which merit decertification of the Antrim County results in other counties throughout the State of Michigan, such evidence would justify the decertification of the State of Michigan election results.

If there is evidence of the same issues that merited decertification of the State of Michigan election results in other states, such evidence would justify the decertification of the federal election results.”

But, it will not happen since the system from the ground up, is totally corrupt. Breakup America now!