The Origins of White Guilt By Brian Simpson

Dr Tom Sunic has recently written on the origins of white guilt. Why is it that most of the white race, but not all, mainly Nordics (Northern Europeans), feel this guilt, which has become a new religion, while it means nothing to Blacks and Asians … witness the Asian nations who do what they want, not to criticise them, but to praise them for their strength:

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/02/08/the-origins-of-white-guilt/  

There is the role of Marxism, and especially the Frankfurt school which has been well discussed, by the likes of Kevin MacDonald. No, the problem is Christianity he says:

“Putting solely the blame on the liberal media and crypto-communist college professors for generating the culture of White guilt is only partially correct.  In order to tentatively elicit a convincing answer regarding the pathology of White guilt one needs to raise some rhetorical questions about Christian teachings. Why are White Christian peoples, in contrast to other peoples of other races and other religions on Earth, more prone to excessive altruism toward non-White out-groups?  Why are guilt feelings practically nonexistent among non-White peoples? One answer to these questions may be found in Christian teachings that have made up  an important pillar of Western civilization over the centuries.  Over the last one hundred years, modern Liberal and Communist elites have aggressively promoted those same feeling of White guilt, albeit in their own atheistic, secular and “multicultural” modalities. One must rightfully reject the Liberal or Antifa palaver about White guilt, yet the fact remains that the Vatican, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, the German Bishops’ conference, along with all other Christian denominations in Europe and the US today are the loudest sponsors of non-White immigration to Europe and America, as well as the strongest advocates of White guilt. The Church’s ecumenical preaching about a global city under one god with all of humanity is fully in accordance with the early Christian dogma on man’s fall and his eventual redemption.

It must be pointed out that early Christian apostles, evangelists and theologians who foisted the dogma of man’s guilt were all by birth and without any exception non-Europeans (St. Augustine, Tertullian, St. Paul, Cyprian, etc.)  from North Africa, Syria, Asia Minor and Judea.  Having this in mind, lambasting Islam or Judaism in the present as the sole carriers of aggressive non-European anti-White ideology, as many White nationalists do, while downplaying the Middle-Eastern birthplace of Christianity, cannot be a sign of neither moral nor intellectual consistency.  The Roman poet Juvenal, describes graphically in his satires the Rome of the late first century, a time when the city was swarming with multitudes of Syrian lowlifes, Chaldean star worshippers, …  all of them offering a quick ride to eternal salvation for some and eternal damnation for others. Similar messianic, redemptive beliefs about the shining future, under the guidance of prominent early Bolshevik agitators … have found their new location, two millennia later, among credulous intellectuals and equality-hungry masses. After the fall of Communism, the same messianic drive to punish the guilty ones who defy modern Liberal and multicultural scholasticism found its loudest mouthpiece among US neocons and antifa inquisitors.”

The problem with putting the blame for white guilt upon Christianity is that until the post-World War II period, Christianity, the established churches did not support the politically correct agenda. Instead, Christianity has been subject to the same social forces, as say, the universities ands other institutions. White guilt arises from the elites using it as a tool to achieve their agenda, a soft mind manipulation tactic, rather than going straight for the guns.