It’s been exhausting covering the US election for readers, with my fellow Aussie/American journalist friend here, Chris Knight. Everyday there seems to be new revelations of Clinton evil, but she just gets away with it, so far.
Beginning in no particular order, the Clinton foundation itself has confirmed that it accepted a $1million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. She had signed an ethics agreement in order to become Secretary of State to notify the State Department’s ethics official if a foreign government such as Qatar wanted to make donations, so that any concerns could be raised. However, the State Department found no record of the Clinton Foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review and that it was “incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed review.”
At least eight other countries donated to the Foundation without the State Department being informed:  http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-foundation-idUSKBN12Z2SL. This is but one more example of Clinton placing herself above the rule of law, let alone morality. Conflicts of interest seem to matter nothing to the Clintons.                                        

The Remnant (http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/itemlist/user/607-elizabethyore),  reports on the Soros/Clinton/Vatican partnership, or should we call it conspiracy.  Soros’ Open society granted $650,000 to PICO, a radical organisation for a meeting in the Vatican about the 2016 election. Here is what the article says about the outcome:

“Not surprisingly, the outcome of the PICO 3-day Vatican meeting suddenly materialized in the WikiLeaks emails of John Podesta inbox. A detailed report on the critical PICO/Vatican trip would certainly be of critical interest to the Chairman of the Clinton Presidential Campaign, underscoring the Soros/Clinton/Vatican partnership. (Full disclosure: Soros gave $25 million to the Clinton presidential campaign and Podesta previously chaired the Soros’ Center for American Progress). And, indeed, the meeting notes disclose valuable insight and intelligence about the leftist cabal at work in the Vatican.

WikiLeaks pulls back the curtain on the radicals entrenched in the Francis papacy. The PICO Vatican meeting was not simply a brisk cursory papal meet and greet. Rather, documents reveal that Alinsky activists were invited, welcomed, and dined in intense strategy sessions with high level Vatican cardinals. The leaked emails expose the leftist political machinations behind the Francis papacy, where the Soros-funded community organizers coordinated radical messaging with high level papal cardinal confidantes. 
Why would Soros underwrite this Vatican trip? It is obviously a wise investment with long term benefits.

The Podesta email cache reinforces the ongoing collaboration of Soros globalists with Francis and his papal minions. From the moment of Bergoglio’s papal elevation, George Soros identified Bergoglio as a kindred spirit, a radical globalist, with the much sought after authority and moral voice of the Catholic Church.

Pope Francis shares Soros’ world view: climate change, mass migration, income inequality, globalism, and capitalism bashing.”

In summary, there really is, as Eric butler said many times, a family tie-up of the globalists, who work together across borders, to end borders. Clinton and the present Pope are right in this network. Before Wikileaks and DCLeaks, it was essentially a matter of inference, but now we have behind-the-scenes records of the inner machinations of people who have put themselves above the rule of law.
See further: http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/2853-wikileaks-bombshell-george-soros-using-francis-papacy.

Don’t think for a moment that even poor little Australia has escaped the Clinton foundation Hydra. Here is the October 31, 2016 headline from  http://www.hangthebankers.com/australian-taxpayers-donation-corrupt-clinton-foundation/,  “Australian Taxpayers Charged over $88 Million for Donation to Corrupt Clinton Foundation.”  Yes, under fellow feminist Julia Gillard, and other prime ministers, Australia was one of the world’s biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation, the article says.
Here are some details about how our tax dollars have been wasted by the elites:

“On the Clinton Foundation website, AusAID and the Commonwealth of Australia score separate entries in the $10 million-plus group of donors, one rung up from American teacher unions.
In 2009-10 Kevin Rudd handed over another $10 million to the foundation for climate research, part of $300 million he squandered on a Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute.
Gillard also donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.
Lo and behold, she became chairman in 2014 and has been actively promoting Clinton as president ever since — in a campaign video last December slamming Trump, in opeds trumpeting the next woman president and in appearances with Clinton spruiking girls’ education.
The Abbott government topped up the left-wing organisation’s coffers with another $140 million in 2014, bringing total Australian largesse to $460 million, according to a press release from Foreign Minister Julie Bishop.”

For all of this money Australia got, according to Wikileaks, a pile of Green activists intent on destroying our coal industry, especially the $16 billion Adani coal mine in Queensland linked to the Clinton campaign. The tentacles of this organisation encircle the world.

Next, we have the revelations via the magic of Wikileaks, that an Associated Press reporter had said that although the FBI said that they had taken possession of Clinton’s thumb drive, “If you wanted to steer us away and say that we are misinformed, then I would gladly accept that as well” : http://www.naturalnews.com/055879_Associated_Press_Eric_Tucker_dishonest_journalism.html. So, even though it is true, please, please, say that it is false! One wonders whether any of the mainstream news is trustworthy.

Going away from the mainstream, the internet is awash with speculation that the John Podesta emails contain some link to child sex trafficking and a possible Washington DC connection: http://wearechange.org/internet-fire-speculation-podesta-emails-contain-code-child-sex/; http://www.anonews.co/clinton-scandal/. There is an enormous amount of material on this, which shades into the really conspiratorial and freaky far-out. The references are given for those interested, but personally I am just not sure. All of the food reference emails are certainly simply bizarre; “walnut sauce for the pasta? Mary plz tell us the straight story, was the sauce actually very tasty?” This is code word for something, but it may not be sex; for all we know at present it could be some other corruption. Or, there could actually be evidence of a Washington DC child sex ring on Anthony Weiner’s laptop: http://yournewswire.com/nypd-hillary-clinton-child-sex-scandal/.  As with all of this, we need to keep open surveillance of the information as it comes in.

In conclusion, Hillary Clinton is very likely to steal the election continuing the tradition of election corruption than has characterised American politics since the beginning: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/11/americas-inglorious-tradition-of-election-fraud-any-cure-in-sight-part-1/. This time though, all hell is likely to break loose. It looks like enough Americans have had enough.