It really does not look good as an argument for accepting the experimental mRNA vax technology, given that so-called secure aspects of medicine are coming under scrutiny for fraud. One honest whistle-blower researcher in the field of Alzheimer’s drugs has said that she believes that another researcher may have doctored images to butter up results for an Alzheimer’s drug, the research being published in a leading generalist science journal, Science. If this proves to be correct, it is just one more case of seemingly safe foundations being shown to be of feet of clay. If so, or the more reason to be highly suspicious about the mRNA vaxxes which proceeded
at “warp speed,” without long decades of testing, beginning with animal studies.